Your underwriters are not the bottleneck.
The file is.
A D&O or E&O submission takes 60–90 minutes to spread before a single underwriting decision gets made. We get that file decision-ready in under 12 minutes. Same team. More quotes. More wins.
No commitment. We run it on one of your actual submissions first.
Brokers submit to three financial lines MGAs.
The slowest one loses. Every time.
The same submissions. The same PDFs. The same manual spreading. Not because your team does not know what to analyze — because there are not enough hours to analyze everything on every file.
Your underwriters are spreading financials by hand. Every file. Every time.
A single D&O or E&O submission arrives as a 100-page PDF. Three years of balance sheets, income statements, cash flows — all need to be extracted, spread into a model, and ratio-checked before anyone looks at the risk. Done correctly, that takes 60–90 minutes per file. At 100 submissions a month, that is 100–150 hours of data entry before a single underwriting decision gets made.
Brokers submit to three financial lines MGAs. The one that quotes first wins.
D&O and E&O brokers run competitive placements across multiple MGAs simultaneously. The first competitive indication wins the account nearly half the time — not the best-priced quote, the first one. An MGA that returns an indication in 4 hours beats one that takes 4 days. The gap is almost entirely file preparation time, not underwriting judgment.
The underwriters who know which financial patterns predict claims are leaving.
Your senior financial lines underwriters have spent years learning which leverage ratios precede D&O events, which industries mask distress in their balance sheets, which broker books carry adverse selection. When they leave, that pattern recognition leaves too. New underwriters look at the same spreads and miss what a 20-year veteran would flag in 30 seconds.
Hard numbers.
Not estimates.
And it resets every time a new file arrives.
Every financial lines underwriter knows what to analyze. The leverage ratios. The coverage ratios. The off-balance-sheet items. The litigation history. The industry distress signals. The broker's submission quality track record.
The problem is not knowledge. It is execution at volume. At 100 submissions a month, doing every check on every file — spreading 3 years of financials, pulling EDGAR filings, running PACER checks, benchmarking ratios against industry medians — consistently, without exception — is not humanly possible in the time brokers give you.
AI tools have existed in financial lines for years. They triaged your queue. They built dashboards. What they could not do was act. The shift that matters: agents that run the moment a submission arrives, fire every enrichment check in parallel, and deliver a complete analytical workup before your underwriter opens the file.
Most AI tools are day-one every day. Ours is not.
If we do not save your team time
on the first file, you do not move forward.
No seat licenses. No annual contracts up front. We start by running the agent on one live submission from your current queue. You see the output. You decide if it is worth continuing.
Show me on a live submissionNo commitment. We show you the output first.
We run it on your file.
Then you decide.
No demo of features you have not asked for. No sales deck. One live submission from your current queue. We run the full financial analysis and show you the complete workup. Elapsed time: under 12 minutes.
Send us one live submission from your current queue.
Any format — PDF financials, broker email, portal export. We sign an NDA before you send anything. One current submission is enough.
We run the full financial analysis in real time.
Financial spreading across all years. Ratio benchmarking against industry. Litigation and entity checks. Risk signal flagging. Complete workup assembled in parallel.
You see what your underwriter would have spent 90 minutes building.
Delivered in under 12 minutes. Then you decide if that changes anything about how your team operates.
You will speak with a founder who has read your specific workflow. Not a sales rep.